Ī real issue is, I don’t want to buy 2500 GPU and understand that 1080ti for 800$ is doing same good job or betterīut GTXs have no ECC function which is good for me, only quadros and firepros have ECC This guy has more than 20 times GPU power than you but still his CPU is faster.Īt first place of course is the Viewport performance in Maya and upcoming Arnold render (most likely will be openCL GPU based)Ĭan you share any info regarding maya ? AFAIK maya is openGL based. Maybe you can borrow a newer GPU just to try if it makes a difference. It took me many years to learn this ignoring any marketing.
FURY X FP64 OFFLINE
My own experience with GPUs for offline rendering and film editing is dated, but spending more than 300 turned out to be wasted money. (Be sure you use the proper PCI slot for the GPU, they might have different transfer rates) And If that’s the reason Realflow gets a slow down a stronger GPU would not help at all. If this becomes the bottleneck (which is quite likely) it may not matter if you spend 200 or 2000 bucks on a GPU.
In offline rendering there is the additional problem to transfer a lot of data between CPU and GPU each frame. Compute benchmarks are too rare to get an unbiased impression. Technical specs tell you almost nothing, gaming benchmarks are totally pointless. I agree it’s hard to compare compute performance. Fury and RX480 have it, but Furys 4 GB RAM may be a limit. (Requesting it in public forums is the best thing you can do for nowĪMD has 2.0 support on consumer hardware but watch out with older cards. It’s unlikely the API version matters a lot if 1.2 is still supportet by Realflow, but you can only wait until NV releases CL 2.0 to consumer HW.
FURY X FP64 DRIVERS
Maybe its a API version, on quadros openCL 2 comes with drivers and firepros alsoĢ.0 by default, maybe if nvidia will release 2.0 for their drivers I will check that also It means it should do something but again times is slower than CPU Now I can’t understand anything because I found that my titan is very good at 32bit floating point performance Realflow hybrido domain Firepro VS quadro VS gtx You have nothing in fact, only rumors that some hardware is betterīenchmarks also yes, but for example there is no such benchmark like Thats what I’m talking about, its a real pain in the a… when you have no rules to compare It’s better to look for benchmarks for your most important tools. for very large scenes with tiny details - usually we have enough with FP32 because distant details do not matter.)īut TFlops might not help you a lot to pick a new GPU anyways.
FURY X FP64 SOFTWARE
I’m not sure if any redering software uses FP64 but it’s very unlikely. FP16 can represent colors or normals but unlikely vertex positions. To me Kepler was at least 10 times faster than 4 core i7 CPU, so maybe their OpenCL implementation is just not that practical.ĪMD is a good option if you don’t need Cuda.ĪFAIK GP100 is the only current chip that has a speed advantage for FP16 (upcoming AMD Vega has it for consumer hardware), but it will take time until this matters in practice because there is no software yet. Other algorithms - different numbers.)īut you should ask the developers of Realflow what they recommend. (I get those numbers from development of FP32 algorithms. So i guess upgrading to a recent Pascal GPU could give you a speed up of maybe 6 too. GTX 1070 is 6 (!) times faster than Kepler GTX 670. Kepler also had worse compute performance (but better power efficiency) than the older Fermi.ĪMD 280X was about 1.9 times faster than expensive Kepler Titan for me in OpenCL.ĪMD FuryX is still 1.6 times faster than GTX 1070. Short question: is there any reasong my GTX titan kepler, never gives me good results in GPU openCL ?Īre GTXs capable of compute any of them 16/32/64 ? or only Quadros have that ability ?
FURY X FP64 64 BIT
Does it mean that P4000 will never compute 16 and 64 bit operations ?ģ Which one from those 3: 16/32/64 is used when computing using openCL on GPU ?.Whereas, Quadro P4000 have only 32bit performance record: įor example brand NEW GP100 Quadro have : Some GPUs have 16bit/32bit/64bit performance info in their description specs. So, which Unit inside GPU in used when GPU computes on openCL ?.When Using (GPU CUDA) redshift renderer for example, I know and see that it uses and loads GPU and surely times are amazing compared to CPU render.
FURY X FP64 INSTALL
If I understand correctly, I can’t install 2.2 on GPU, its something that built inside it, right ? Here on that site newest is 2.2, is that a reason of not computing openCL on GPU ? I have some question regarding simulation times in Realflow and other software packages that using OpenCL acceleration First of all, my GTX card shows me that it has 1.2 version of openCL.
0 kommentar(er)
